Sunday, October 28, 2012

Learning 2012 Conference - Day 3

Global Leadership Development

The conference has given me a lot to think about in the field of leadership development over the past three days. I will share what I've learned and some things perhaps to think about as we go about developing leaders in an increasingly smaller global space.

There seems to be an increasing awareness of the lack of talent who are capable of taking on global leadership roles. As we grow organizations around the world and expand our footprint in foreign lands, we have the expectation that we will be able to increase our intake of foreign-trained leaders. However, according to Accenture's Rahul Varma, talent development in emerging markets like the BRIC countries is not keeping pace with market growth. In these  countries, 1 in 7 people have access to technology that they can use to grow their capabilities. He says that we need to make the online resources available to those who have access also available offline so that emerging market talent has a chance to compete. 
John Ryan would agree. Ryan's comment on global leadership development is that one can't start too early or too organically. Recognizing the target culture and preparing high potential leaders for the culture, values and culturally defined capabilities within that new environment will go a long way to enabling success. 

The biggest risks we're making in preparing and growing our leadership talent? Ryan says focusing on the individual's performance and not on their agility or potential. According to Ryan (and the Centre for Creative Leadership) it is a person's learning agility and their potential to both learn and grow in breadth and depth of experience that determines a good leader.

Here's a good video with a short explanation of how to maximize global leadership development:

Monday, October 22, 2012

Learning 2012 Day 2

Today's focus: Professional practice and building a centre of competence


Today I focused on learning more about what others are doing and have been thinking about around building communities of practice in the field of learning.

The CIA (yes, THE CIA) has taken an interesting approach to developing their learning pros and also their new learning people and SMEs. They are creating a program that pairs masters with novices to work side by side in a kind of apprenticeship/ mentoring program that they call "tradecraft". They have taken this approach with their other  employees in transferring and mastering field, ahem, techniques that can't effectively be taught in a classroom or a lab setting. This way, the long held 'secrets of the trade' can be passed along to the people who will need to know and will need to use them.
Another interesting thing the CIA is doing is applying action based learning to their development team to help them capture lessons learned and grow in their own governance of the learning professional practice. Cool!

Along the same lines, I also had the opportunity to listen to Richard Culatta from the US Dept of Educational Technology talk about developing local communities of innovation to build better collaborative opportunities in developing people 'outside the box'. Richard recommends having an entrepreneur in residence to give you another way to think about scale and other ways of looking at your audience.

According to Culatta, Michael Porter says that regions that work together as a region work better together than groups that are geographically distributed and increase innovation hugely - you need education innovation clusters. To increase your innovation opportunities, you need to invite people who aren't in your workspace and partner with developers and entrepreneurs to see what you can do to help each other support and develop innovation for your area.

The last piece of today's quest to find information about professional practice is about growing online communities. The best advice I got in this respect is to:

  • Take it slow. Communities take time to grow organically and you need to have patience. To help with managerial expectations of instant success, keep the bar low on the number of adopters at first.
  • Give your community members something to look at and interact with right away. People don't have a lot of time these days and to have to imagine where they 'may' hang out later, its hard. Populate and encourage people to contribute. 
  • Keep your audience and their location and their interaction styles in mind when selecting and developing a platform for hosting your online community. If you don't go where your audience is, they won't 'get' your community and you'll have an empty neighbourhood!

Sunday, October 21, 2012

Learning 2012 Conference - Day 1

Today's the first day of the Learning 2012 conference put on by Elliot Masie and it's the first time I'm attending. I am going to share some of what I am learning and also consider what all of this means to myself as a learning professional and also for the organization that I work for right now.

So tonight's opening presentation had 1600 people all together and came in 4 main parts that I found interesting.  Here's what I liked.

Part 1: Richard Cullata, Director Educational Technology, US Dept Education

Richard was called an "edupunk" by Elliott and enjoyed the moniker. His take on edupunks, or eduhackers, was to think of himself as a person largely concerned with using technology as a disruptive force to increase learning. He sees the largest changes in learning will come with the ability to analyse 'big data' and says thst this will change the way we deliver learning. We will be able to see where people are really learning (and where they're guessing for example) to be able to build a better system that gives agency to learners to control their own experiences. Perhaps, he mused, learners will be able to take control of their learning to such an extent that they will be able to demonstrate competency and earn badges rather than take courses and get paper certificates.

Richard is looking to  find 'educational entrepreneurs' who will be able to see the hole end-to-end picture, make learning that is scalable, flexible and functional for these newly activated learners.

Part 2: Lisa Pedrogo - CNN

And now for something completely different! Lisa works for CNN and apparently has been working with the learning consortium for a couple of years. Anyway, they did a piece on creating video for learning and the main rules go something like this:
  1. Keep it simple. You probably can only fit about 2 1/2 minutes of video into someone's head at a time so don't feel you have to get too fancy.
  2. Plan your storyboard and shots before you get out the camera. This means:
  • Figure out what your learners really need to know
  • Create a realistic storyboard that captures the essential elements using visuals and sound
  • Create your content script and gather images
2. Shoot, but before you tear down, check your shots against your storyboard
3. Edit!!!

You could also use this a start for immersive eLearning and simulations... or really great presentations. You could go here to experience it yourself: 

Sunday, April 20, 2008

It's the Human Touch that we need...

So you have a lot of information available to you but you don't have time to read it or act on it. Isn't that the truth for anyone interested in the world and in their own business these days? I have heard it said that "Information wants to be free, but custom information wants to be really expensive". If you read this post from Wired Magazine you'll understand that even more.

It is important that business owners and others trying to make their way forward in the world need to keep abreast of information but very few have time to work their way through all of it to do what they want well. Wired reports on customized searches and summaries done by humans, not machines. Cool! So the algorithms are giving us too much and aren't thinking for us. At the end of the day, it all comes back to us having someone help us out with all the information.

This is true in running a business. You can't do it all and you can't see it all. You need help, so you hire employees, advisors, specialists and consultants. But at the end of the day, you still need to sift through everything and make the decisions. What if you don't know what decisions to make? Perhaps you need someone to help you summarize your biggest challenges and problems so that you can take a better "birds-eye view" of them and make your next successful move. Perhaps what you need is a mirror and a magnifying glass (conceptually) to help you. Penny Ferguson is fond of saying, "The brain that has the question also has the answer" and that's totally true. After all the reading, information, and process, you need someone to help you by really listening. You need the human touch...

Sunday, March 16, 2008

Three steps to creating better working environments

I had a really great conversation this week about how to make better working environments. It centred around work done by the folks at Gallup. According to the experts in research sampling, there are only three crucial things needed to make a work environment great, and to make the company productive and profitable. Here they are:

1. Hire people and give them an orientation that creates brand awareness and a sense of ownership.
2. Communicate to everyone in the business on a regular basis using information and language that is meaningful and relevant to them.
3. Teach people how to use the tools to do their jobs; and then let them do it.

Now, I don't know about you, but that seems pretty straightforward to me. The folks at Gallup apparently looked at all sorts of things that make a business powerful and these were the three biggest ones to keep the business running smoothly and profitably. I have had the experience of creating all three of these, and I have had the experience of not having these three. There is a powerful difference between the two. I wonder why so many companies can't get this mix right? A good realistic look and an experienced Instructional Systems Designer (ISD) can help; perhaps this is why not so many people have gotten it right; many view the ISD role as simply one to come after the brand and positioning.

Sunday, March 9, 2008

Posted by Ben McConnell on January 27, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (8) | TrackBacks (2)

January 25, 2007Dante would be proud
Think you have it bad at your job? Here's a true story: A well-known law firm is trying to teach its partners to say "thank you" and "good work" to its associates. You know, that weird common courtesy stuff.

It's no joke. The firm lost 31% of its associates in 2004 and another 30% of them in 2005. Each year, one-third of highly educated associates who make about $160,000 per year decide the money's not worth it.

Monday, March 3, 2008

How do you get better employees?

How many psychiatrists does it take to change a lightbulb?
One, but it has to really want to change!

Have you ever thought that about your people, your customers, or your business? You know that your business can grow because there is a market, you have the right mix, you have the right pricing. So what is it? Why aren’t your employees as engaged, as committed, as capable of making decisions and bowl your customers over with unbelievable customer service as you are?

There could be a number of factors, but one of them might be you. As an entrepreneur, this isn’t a job; it’s a way of life. Your company is your work; your investment; your pride; and hopefully, your retirements or security. Your people are different: they work there and were hired. They can be released and they know it. It is a special person who can start and grow a business and it is likely not your employees’ mindset.

You should expect, if your company is running like most companies, that the following is true for a staff of twenty:

Even the best performing companies have actively disengaged staff. The question, as a business owner, shouldn’t be how can I engage and motivate my staff; it should be who is responsible for not de-motivating my staff? According to “Energize your workplace: How to Build and Sustain High Quality Connections at work”, the greatest impact on defining employees’ working experiences can be summarized in good leadership, open communication, and demonstrated ethics and fairness.


So what about you? Jim Collins, author of “Good to Great” says, “Whether someone is the “right person” has more to do with the character traits and innate capabilities than with specific knowledge, background or skills.” Do you know about yourself and how this affects your decision-making, your leadership, and your business? Do you want to find out? A relatively easy and inexpensive way to start is with the Keirsey Temperament Sorter. You can pay the $14 fee for the complete assessment, or you can take the free part and Google it yourself. You can’t change disengaged employees, but through good leadership, communication and training, you can keep your engaged staff longer.

To get more help sorting your training needs from your organizational needs, call the training pirates. We’ll help you get what you want.